rasdl -p complex type output misleading for mdd and set types

[beccati@…]

rasdl -p output is misleading for mdd and set types as it lists the base type definition instead of the type name used to create the mdd or set type. See example below.

typedef struct { float level01, float level02, float level03, float level04, float level05, float level06, float level07, float level08, float level09, float level10, float level11, float level12, float level13, float level14, float level15, float level16, float level17, float level18, float level19, float level20 } ModPr20Pixel;
typedef marray <struct { float level01, float level02, float level03, float level04, float level05, float level06, float level07, float level08, float level09, float level10, float level11, float level12, float level13, float level14, float level15, float level16, float level17, float level18, float level19, float level20 }, 2> ModP20Image;

I think the second line should read

typedef marray <ModPr20Pixel, 2> ModP20Image;

Alan