Opened 6 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
#1972 closed enhancement (fixed)
SECORE_EPSG versions in secoredb folder which don't exist in def.war should be collected when it starts
Reported by: | Bang Pham Huu | Owned by: | Bang Pham Huu |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | 9.8 |
Component: | secore | Version: | 9.7 |
Keywords: | Cc: | Dimitar Misev, Vlad Merticariu | |
Complexity: | Medium |
Description
Currently, SECORE only regards EPSG versions which are included in def.war
(e.g: version 8.5, 8.9.2 and 9.4.2). However, some existing versions (e.g: version 9.5, 9.5.2,…) which don't exist in def.war
at tomcat/webapps/secoredb
are not regarded and SECORE does not open these existing databases.
DEBUG [2019-01-29 11:18:39] BaseX@95: The database gml_85 doesn't seem to exist INFO [2019-01-29 11:18:39] BaseX@97: Initializing database gml_85 INFO [2019-01-29 11:18:43] BaseX@118: Database successfully initialized. INFO [2019-01-29 11:18:43] BaseX@92: Database connection to userdb successfully opened. INFO [2019-01-29 11:18:43] BaseX@92: Database connection to gml_942 successfully opened. DEBUG [2019-01-29 11:18:43] BaseX@95: The database gml_892 doesn't seem to exist INFO [2019-01-29 11:18:43] BaseX@97: Initializing database gml_892 INFO [2019-01-29 11:18:46] BaseX@118: Database successfully initialized. INFO [2019-01-29 11:18:47] BaseX@92: Database connection to gml_0 successfully opened.
Change History (7)
follow-up: 2 comment:1 by , 6 years ago
comment:2 by , 6 years ago
Replying to dmisev:
Could we decouple the EPSG datasets to be outside of the def.war? So that a user could add their own for example if needed
Yes, if this patch is fixed, they just need to add to secoredb
a new EPSG version folder (e.g: tomcat/webapps/secoredb/gml_9.1)
follow-up: 4 comment:3 by , 6 years ago
Ok, then this should also be documented (e.g. what naming scheme should be used, permissions and such).
comment:4 by , 6 years ago
Replying to dmisev:
Ok, then this should also be documented (e.g. what naming scheme should be used, permissions and such).
yes, it should be added to the patch also.
comment:5 by , 6 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
comment:6 by , 6 years ago
Resolution: | fixed |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
I see this now, it seems like the old dirs need to be removed by secore?
drwxrwxr-x. 2 rasdaman rasdaman 4096 Feb 2 08:10 gml_0 drwxrwxr-x. 2 rasdaman rasdaman 4096 Jan 24 14:10 gml_85 drwxrwxr-x. 2 rasdaman rasdaman 4096 Feb 2 08:10 gml_8.5 drwxrwxr-x. 2 rasdaman rasdaman 4096 Jan 24 14:10 gml_892 drwxrwxr-x. 2 rasdaman rasdaman 4096 Feb 2 08:10 gml_8.9.2 drwxrwxr-x. 2 rasdaman rasdaman 4096 Jan 24 14:10 gml_942 drwxrwxr-x. 2 rasdaman rasdaman 4096 Feb 2 08:10 gml_9.4.2 drwxrwxr-x. 2 rasdaman rasdaman 4096 Feb 2 08:10 userdb
comment:7 by , 6 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | reopened → closed |
Could we decouple the EPSG datasets to be outside of the def.war? So that a user could add their own for example if needed