Opened 9 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
#1275 closed enhancement (fixed)
conversion code should be refactored
Reported by: | Dimitar Misev | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | 10.0 |
Component: | conversion | Version: | development |
Keywords: | Cc: | Peter Baumann, Vlad Merticariu, Alex Dumitru | |
Complexity: | Medium |
Description (last modified by )
In many cases, existing code in source:conversion can be removed and the corresponding function can be aliased to encode()
. With this we can also remove a couple of direct dependencies of rasdaman as they become indirect dependencies via gdal: bmp, jpeg, png, tiff.
These functions can be refactored:
- bmp
- jpeg
- png
- tiff
Stay internal:
- grib
- hdf
- netcdf
Not sure about:
- dem
- ecw (not compiled at the moment)
Removed
- tor (can't find information on a tor format)
- vff (can't find information on a vff format)
- int16 (= dem now, see comment:3, comment:4)
NITF reader (see comment:2):
- ntf.cc is the convertor class using the others; we should keep these sources, NTF should be renamed to NITF, and at some time this should be properly compiled into libconversion and tested.
- nitf.cc
- des.cc
- graphic.cc
- image.cc
- res.cc
- utilities.cc
Furthermore, it would be good to remove the dedicated source:insertutils/insertppm.cc and either have a corresponding ppm/inv_ppm functions or connect to decode/encode(..,"ppm")
See also #1139
Change History (9)
comment:1 by , 9 years ago
- tor, vff: not existing anymore, can be removed
- ecw: commercial, so cannot be used in rasdaman community anyway
- last series: likely can be removed, except maybe int16
- insertppm: does more, we need to capture extra parameters when doing encode (_,"ppm") which I find a good idea
comment:2 by , 8 years ago
These are all part of a NITF reader, even though currently they are not compiled into libconversion so I doubt it will work:
#include "nitf.h" #include "image.h" #include "graphic.h" #include "text.h" #include "des.h" #include "res.h" #include "utilities.h"
source:conversion/ntf.cc makes an attempt to use nitf.h, just for ingestion as far as I could see. NTF
is a bad choice in this case, because it an acronym for an unrelated format: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Transfer_Format
So we should keep these sources, NTF should be renamed to NITF, and at some time this should be properly compiled into libconversion and tested.
follow-up: 4 comment:3 by , 8 years ago
source:conversion/int16.hh seems to be some sort of a DEM format? Here's the documentation in the header file:
Format specification:
int16
input parameters:
- geox geo reference x of upper left point (float >0)
- geoy geo reference y of upper left point (float >0)
- resx horizontal resolution (pixel distance) in meters (float >0)
- resy vertical resolution (pixel distance) in meters (float >0)
- hstep factor by which pixel values have to be multiplied to obtain real height in meters (float >0)
An int16 file contains a sequence of sizex*sizey height values, advancing from west to east and from north to south.
Each pixel consists of a 16 bit integer where the lower byte comes first in sequence (i.e., pixel value is byte[i]+byte[i+1]*256).
There is no file header, pixels start immediately at the beginning.
Points are defined as follows for pixel position (i,j) in file (starting with (0/0):
- geo position x = geox + i*resx
- geo position y = geoy + j*resy
- height = ( byte[ 2*i + 2*j*sizex] + byte[ 2*i + 2*j*sizex + 1] * 256 ) * hstep
comment:4 by , 8 years ago
Replying to dmisev:
source:conversion/int16.hh seems to be some sort of a DEM format? Here's the documentation in the header file:
Actually replace int16 with DEM and you get the same code as source:conversion/dem.cc. So removing int16
comment:5 by , 8 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:6 by , 8 years ago
correct, this was a DEM format specifically requested by an agency earlier. It seems to be used by some, so let us only remove it if DEM can do exactly the same (ie, 16-bit int).
comment:8 by , 8 years ago
I've aliased png, jpeg and bmp to GDAL, and removed insertppm as it can be completely replaced by rasql and decode. With this we remove the libpng, libjpeg, and netpbm dependencies.
I can't decide yet about tiff, our implementation seems faster than GDAL, for RGB especially up to 50% faster.
comment:9 by , 8 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |