Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#1118 closed enhancement (fixed)
simplify rasnet use
Reported by: | Peter Baumann | Owned by: | Alex Toader |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | critical | Milestone: | 9.2 |
Component: | rasnet | Version: | development |
Keywords: | Cc: | George Merticariu | |
Complexity: | Medium |
Description (last modified by )
The whole procedure described in http://rasdaman.org/wiki/InstallFromSource#rasnetcommunicationprotocol should go into the Makefiles.
Change History (10)
comment:1 by , 9 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:2 by , 9 years ago
Cc: | added; removed |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from | to
Status: | new → assigned |
follow-up: 5 comment:3 by , 9 years ago
I was planning on doing this after the release as it requires substantial changes. You usually don't do major changes in beta. Alex's installer can take care of this for now. If you want I can do the changes until Wednesday
comment:4 by , 9 years ago
yes, please do implement these changes. Usability is an important acceptance factor.
comment:5 by , 9 years ago
Replying to atoader:
You usually don't do major changes in beta.
Agreed, although rasnet is still optional so it's perhaps not so critical.
comment:6 by , 9 years ago
I want to create a third_party folder which will contain a folder named grpc which points to the GRPC repo (the folder will be added using git submodules).
I need to build grpc and protobuf (included in grpc's dependencies) and install them to a temporary location.
What should this temporary location be? It needs to exists throughout the build process because I will use it for the include path and library paths needed by rasdaman.
comment:7 by , 9 years ago
I think that users who want to use raslib will also need access to these libraries. They will link their code against raslib and the libraries of the communication protocol. Any thoughts on how to structure this?
comment:8 by , 9 years ago
rasnet conveys tons of compiler warnings which need to be removed. Further, we might suppress the warnings coming from the Google code.
comment:9 by , 9 years ago
I think the warnings issue should be moved to its own ticket. It will require more than a few hours of work.
comment:10 by , 9 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
Alex should create the git submodules structure for these dependencies if I remember correctly?