Opened 9 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
#1077 closed defect (wontfix)
Rasdaman protocol benchmark
Reported by: | Alex Dumitru | Owned by: | Dimitar Misev |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | Future |
Component: | rasnet | Version: | development |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Complexity: | Medium |
Description
We need to know the difference in performance in a more formal way. Let's test for:
- 1 kb
- 1 mb
- 10 mb
- 100 mb
- 1 gb
- 10 gb
and see how much it takes for RNP and for rasnet.
Feel free to modify the benchmark if you have better ideas
Change History (6)
comment:1 by , 9 years ago
comment:3 by , 9 years ago
Component: | undecided → rasnet |
---|---|
Milestone: | → 9.2 |
Is this done? I'm not sure what milestone to put.
comment:4 by , 8 years ago
Milestone: | 9.2 → 10.0 |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from | to
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:5 by , 6 years ago
Milestone: | 10.0 → Future |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from | to
comment:6 by , 5 years ago
Resolution: | → wontfix |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
I think it is also good if you test with decreasing in users request also.
Get the total time from all users by Rasdaman RNP and Rasnet to see how quick is it. (1 user ~ 1 thread).