Opened 12 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
#254 closed defect (worksforme)
Regular computed index much slower than R+ tree index — at Version 4
Reported by: | Dimitar Misev | Owned by: | Dimitar Misev |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | 10.0 |
Component: | indexmgr | Version: | 8.3 |
Keywords: | Cc: | Peter Baumann | |
Complexity: | Very Hard |
Description (last modified by )
Fixing ticket #161 has revealed that the RC index is much slower than the RPT index, even though the idea of the RC index is to be faster for regular tiling.
RC index: insert 1.77s, selecting whole object 0.037s
rasql -q 'drop collection COLL' --user rasadmin --passwd rasadmin > /dev/null 2>&1 rasql -q 'create collection COLL GreySet' --quiet --user rasadmin --passwd rasadmin time rasql -q 'insert into COLL values marray x in [0:1199,0:1199] values 1c tiling regular [0:99,0:99] tile size 10000 index rc_index' --user rasadmin --passwd rasadmin --quiet time rasql -q 'select add_cells(c) from COLL as c' --out string
RPT index: insert 1.73s, selecting whole object 0.040s
rasql -q 'drop collection COLL' --user rasadmin --passwd rasadmin > /dev/null 2>&1 rasql -q 'create collection COLL GreySet' --quiet --user rasadmin --passwd rasadmin time rasql -q 'insert into COLL values marray x in [0:1199,0:1199] values 1c tiling regular [0:99,0:99] tile size 10000 index rpt_index' --user rasadmin --passwd --quiet time rasql -q 'select add_cells(c) from COLL as c' --out string
Change History (4)
comment:1 by , 12 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:2 by , 12 years ago
Milestone: | → Future |
---|
comment:3 by , 5 years ago
Complexity: | → Very Hard |
---|---|
Milestone: | Future → 11.0 |
comment:4 by , 5 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Milestone: | 11.0 → 10.0 |
Resolution: | → worksforme |
Status: | new → closed |
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
I checked again and there's virtually no difference between the two indexes. Closing ticket.