Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #1336, comment 2


Ignore:
Timestamp:
May 31, 2016, 4:14:39 PM (8 years ago)
Author:
Peter Baumann

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #1336, comment 2

    initial v1  
    88
    99Bottom line, my view:
    10 - answer #1: for now, users should only create valid coverage names; auto renaming adds complexity for the users, that's dangerous.
    11 - answer #2: medium range, we should streamline WCS-T and rasql, also in view of CIS 1.1.
     10- answer 1: for now, users should only create valid coverage names; auto renaming adds complexity for the users, that's dangerous.
     11- answer 2: medium range, we should streamline WCS-T and rasql, also in view of CIS 1.1.