Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #1188, comment 22


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Feb 4, 2016, 3:10:16 PM (9 years ago)
Author:
Bang Pham Huu

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #1188, comment 22

    initial v1  
    22> Ok so comment:18, what do you think the right behavior should be? Should WCPS 2.0 support coverage expressions or not? Obviously slicing with an asterisk is an error though so that needs to be fixed.
    33Dimitar, I'm asking with coverage expression e,g c[i(0+0)]. Of course slicing with an asterisk is an error (I don't ask in here) but I want to ask in WCPS 2.0, it support c[i(0+0)] also? But c[i(0+0)] is different with c[i(0)].
     4
     5After that, I can open 2 tickets or just 1 ticket for problem with asterisk.