Opened 9 years ago
Last modified 5 years ago
#1095 closed defect
WCS-T doesn't support CInt16 — at Version 6
Reported by: | Dimitar Misev | Owned by: | Vlad Zamfir |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | 10.0 |
Component: | petascope | Version: | development |
Keywords: | Cc: | Vlad Merticariu, Peter Baumann | |
Complexity: | Medium |
Description (last modified by )
While importing Sentinel 1 SLC data with wcst_import.sh:
Service Call: http://localhost:8080/rasdaman/ows?service=WCS&version=2.0.1&request=InsertCoverage&coverageRef=file:///tmp/ce86a214_1004_4b81_875a_6c7813ae6727.gml&tiling=ALIGNED [0:1023, 0:1023]&pixelDataType=CInt16&useId=existing Error Code: InvalidParameterValue Error Text: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?> <ows:ExceptionReport version="2.0.0" xsd:schemaLocation="http://www.opengis.net/ows/2.0 http://schemas.opengis.net/ows/2.0/owsExceptionReport.xsd" xmlns:ows="http://www.opengis.net/ows/2.0" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <ows:Exception exceptionCode="InvalidParameterValue"> <ows:ExceptionText>Pixel data type CInt16 unknown.</ows:ExceptionText> </ows:Exception> </ows:ExceptionReport>
Attached is a sample tiff file.
Rasdaman supports only 64 and 128 bit complex numbers (floating point only). We should extend this, best to match the GDAL complex number types (we are missing CInt16 and CInt32): http://www.gdal.org/gdal_8h.html#a22e22ce0a55036a96f652765793fb7a4
Change History (7)
by , 9 years ago
Attachment: | sample.tif added |
---|
comment:1 by , 9 years ago
comment:3 by , 9 years ago
a valid request indeed - Sentinel is important. Hope we can find resources - maybe someone from the community would like embark on this…
comment:4 by , 9 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:5 by , 9 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:6 by , 9 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
We could map that to r_Complex, but the problem is that r_Complex is 64 bit (which is the smallest complex type rasdaman supports).
Gdal supports from 16 to 64 bit complex types: http://www.gdal.org/gdal_8h.html#a22e22ce0a55036a96f652765793fb7a4