Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #1055, comment 17


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Nov 10, 2015, 1:28:24 PM (9 years ago)
Author:
Vlad Merticariu

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #1055, comment 17

    initial v1  
     1Some time ago we have decided to keep coverage names in sync with corresponding collection names (it was a request from our users, as it makes things clear and easy to handle for them).
     2
     3If a collection with a name exist (but not a coverage with that name), I agree with Dimitar, we should throw an exception.
     4
    15The alternative is adding a prefix to the name of the coverage for creating the collection name, but this would create even more confusion among our users (think about having coverage MyCoverage and collections MyCoverage and some_prefix_MyCoverage). Then we would need to explain this behavior, basically adding an exception to our rule of keeping names in sync.
    26