Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #1055, comment 16
- Timestamp:
- Nov 10, 2015, 1:26:40 PM (9 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #1055, comment 16
initial v1 1 1 That's not a good strategy Bang. This is better in my opinion: 2 2 3 - ingestion of with name rgb3 - ingestion of coverage with name rgb 4 4 1. if collection rgb doesn't exist in rasdaman, then the collection linked to this coverage will be called rgb 5 5 1. otherwise, if collection rgb already exists in rasdaman, then the collection linked to this coverage will be rgb_{random bits}