Changes between Version 37 and Version 38 of OSGeoIncubationChecklist

Timestamp:

Jun 11, 2014, 5:09:20 AM (10 years ago)

Author:

Peter Baumann

Comment:

—

OSGeoIncubationChecklist

@@ -43 +43 @@
   a. Trac is used for that purpose and is constantly updated as issues are addressed. Ticket list is at http://rasdaman.org/report/1
  1. [[Image(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cc/Icons-mini-icon_accept.gif)]] The project has documented its management processes. NOTE: This is typically done within a Developers Guide or Project Management Plan.
-  a. (looks like duplicate of item 1.c) The project has a suitable open governance policy ensuring decisions are made, documented and adhered to in a public manner. Note: This typically means a Project Management Committee has been established with a process for adding new members. A robust Project Management Committee will typically draw upon developers, users and key stakeholders from multiple organisations as there will be a greater variety of technical visions and the project is more resilient to a sponsor leaving.
-  * developers are actively solicited to have technical discussion directly through the dev list. Based on these improvements it seems we can keep with the overall regime for now.
-
-  a. [[Image(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cc/Icons-mini-icon_accept.gif)]] (duplicate of Open item 1.b) The project uses public communication channels for decision making to maintain transparency. E.g. archived email list(s), archived IRC channel(s), public issue tracker.
+  a. (looks like duplicate of item 1.c) The project has a suitable open governance policy ensuring decisions are made, documented and adhered to in a public manner. Note: This typically means a Project Management Committee has been established with a process for adding new members. A robust Project Management Committee will typically draw upon developers, users and key stakeholders from multiple organisations as there will be a greater variety of technical visions and the project is more resilient to a sponsor leaving: http://www.rasdaman.org/wiki/Governance; developers are actively solicited to have technical discussion directly through the dev list. 
+  a. [[Image(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cc/Icons-mini-icon_accept.gif)]] (duplicate of Open item 1.b) The project uses public communication channels for decision making to maintain transparency. E.g. archived email list(s), archived IRC channel(s), public issue tracker: http://www.rasdaman.org/wiki/MailingLists