Changes between Version 3 and Version 4 of UseOfTickets

Timestamp:

Jan 28, 2014, 3:23:01 PM (10 years ago)

Author:

Piero Campalani

Comment:

add ticket pollution

UseOfTickets

@@ -11 +11 @@
 From the above we have that:
  * Any ticket that is in '''new''' or '''assigned''' status can be sent to other people or anyone can volunteer to work on it (contacting the current owner for guidance or discussing it on the [MailingLists dev list] is a good option for that);
- * Any ticket that is currently "Accepted" is expected to be under work and get either ''regular status updates'' or patch submissions towards its resolution. The owner of such a ticket has to be contacted before changes highly relevant to it are made or before reassignment or acceptance by someone else.
+ * Any ticket that is currently '''accepted''' is expected to be under work and get either ''regular status updates'' or patch submissions towards its resolution. The owner of such a ticket has to be contacted before changes highly relevant to it are made or before reassignment or acceptance by someone else.
 
 Once a ticket is '''resolved''' and the patch submitted it can be closed with a reference to the [WikiFormatting#TracLinks changeset] (so whoever wants to test it can see if it has already been integrated into the dev line or packaged for release).
-* Every patch referring to a ticket shall have a reference to it in the title/description for back reference.
+* Every patch referring to a ticket shall (must!) have a reference to it in the title/description for back reference in the form `ticket:<code>`, see our [StandardsAndGuideLines guidelines].
+
+ Ticket pollution problem::
+   If the solution of the tickets deserves a ''deeper discussion'' with the mailing lists (or with single devs), it is good to spawn it outside the ticket comments onto e-mail or whatever means, and to provide there only concise and useful conclusions.
 
 = See also =